0 10 min 2 yrs

In the warm-up match, Germany lost 49 points men’s basketball. From the perspective of the 2008 Olympic Games, the team that defeated notian King in men’s basketball was quite nearly the top eight. The contrast was so great that it was hard not to let people sigh something. Things are different. The players on both sides have changed a few times. Diving at the level of men’s basketball is not a matter of two days a day. Although the German team has no superstar, the paper lineup is still luxurious. With Schroeder and Xiao Wa as arrows, the development ability is remarkable. A cold NBA team is not fresh. Men’s basketball can’t beat or lose miserably, which is the result of the gap between the two sides.

Games with large gaps will expose a lot of problems, but they will not see the key points because there are too many problems. In fact, even in the previous warm-up match against Italy, you can hardly say which link should be adjusted men’s basketball. The rotation of men’s basketball can’t keep up with the Italian pass-on, and a large number of relieve a garrison without ball ends cannot be explained clearly. The outside line repeatedly leaks the fixed point, and the center basket can’t take into account the lower and lower parts. It neither protects the front side, he also failed to look behind him. On the other hand, facing the delay and rotation in Italy, we played slowly and the precision of transferring the ball was not enough. The players with fixed point of receive the ball could either not enter the small space or the fixed point broke through and started walking. In short, whether the opposite ball goes up or the opposite force us to go up, we will make a lot of mistakes at both ends of attack and defense. Compared with European teams, even if we have hired European celebrities, the team gap is still obvious.

Why do we talk about teamwork here first?

Because this should be our theoretical comparative advantage. We invited Qiao erjievic to come. It is impossible to really improve the players’ personal basic ability in a short period of time. In addition to the arrangement of troops, the teaching trace can mainly reflect the place, it is in the establishment of attack and defense system and the improvement of execution. And the Li keel we introduced is also a team player who relies on multiple contributions to gain a foothold in NBA. In horizontal comparison, our opponents in the group match, not to mention Serbia, can’t compete with the US team and race into the difficult Puerto Rico, it is better to introduce the development alliance MVP Carrick Jones’s South Sudan.

However, teamwork obviously needs to be based on personal ability. For Italy and Germany, the reason why the national team is not “smooth”, making mistakes and making mistakes frequently is that personal ability cannot match this level, making the team’s things impossible. The simplest two things:

Can internal lines go to the low level to make an advantage? Let’s not talk about the one-to-one between the inner line and the inner line. Even in the face of dislocation, did our inner line really play a dominant role in these two games?

Can the defender get rid of the big one in the face of relieve a garrison? If you can’t get rid of it, can you give the ball to the inside teammates who have a small chance to eat?

We can’t do this. There is no need to talk about the rapid return and rotation of the Italian team and the German team after the delay. A simple relieve a garrison will disrupt our tactics. However, if the initiation link fails, there will be no gap in the opponent’s defense line. Naturally, A has no chance to throw it to B,B has no space to throw it to C,C wants to play and feels unable to fight, hesitate, start walking. Therefore, the coach broke the defense on the court.

In these two warm-up matches, what Qiao erevich imagined could only be achieved in a few rounds with little intensity at the beginning. More often, we have no way to fully transform the opponent’s defense line, nor do we really have the ability to cut off the defense by passing the ball. The failure of the initiation link leads to more and more confusion. The so-called “facing the stage fright of the strong team” is better to say that the strong team exposed the lack of basic ability of the players. At this level, the training content can no longer be implemented.

It is not realistic to rely on Li Kael’s personal ability to solve problems. Even if we assume that Li Keel has a large amount of ability to digest the ball rights in the international arena, as a 2.06-meter forward, the most common way of launching is to play one at a low or waist receive the ball. So, after Li Kael wants to be in position, can the defender get it? This does not seem to be a problem in low-level matches. When the opponent really finds that you have to rely on a large number of strikers to solve the problem, it is almost certain that the personal defense guard will play the ball, and our defenders may not really guarantee the quality of the ball. If Li Kael is forced to play from downtown, he will not talk about the effect. It is a question mark only how long the physical fitness can last. To take a step back, Li Kael fired frequently on perpetual motion machine like downtown. The opponent adjusted the strategy and attacked in advance. Can our other players handle 4 to 3, it is also a question mark to quickly solve the problem before the opponent turns in place.

To put it bluntly, in this level of competition, what the national team lacks is not a specific link, but all aspects need to be strengthened. It is true that Li Kelle can do many things, but he can only do one thing at a time. Even if we put him in the role of attack arrow, let him solve the most tight initiation link at present, other functional cooperation is also needed. After all, even if we look at the system in a dozen or four times, the few people watching next to us can throw three points, and we don’t need to say much about what we have done in these two three points.

Now there is no time for despair. After touching two European teams, we fully realized the gap and shortcomings, but our target opponents were not them after all. Training content that cannot be displayed at this level is difficult to say when it reaches the lower level. I can’t see the level of cooking abuse, and the same is true for beating monsters above the level. The national team now needs a match to know how many new things are effective and whether these new things can help us win in half a month. Our current discussion is actually going to talk about details in the case of a huge gap in fundamentals. No matter who you criticize, question, imagine who you use and whether the effect will be better or not, the results will not change. There are only 800 elite soldiers in hand who can’t beat 100000 armies. The problem is not that there is no clever plan, but a huge gap in size. We ourselves are not Zhang Wenyuan, nor can we expect our opponent to be sun Zhongmou.

From a long-term perspective, facing the strong teams in Europe will let us see the current development level of world basketball-before talking about style and relative advantages, the reason why the strong teams are strong teams, it is their fundamentals that have reached a high level. For example, this German team develops the personal ability of the players, the athletic ability of the players, the physical strength, the height of the front court, the external projection, the team nature of attack and defense, and so on. Each single item is remarkable. World basketball is already quite a volume situation, and the gap between us and them is even bigger than that of 4 years ago. Our gap is not in individual positions, nor can it be made up by style, coaching and individual prominent players. We must recognize this reality.

Simply put, it is good for everyone to calm down.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *