0 4 min 2 yrs

Live broadcast bar News on August 5th according to previous reports, James has not passed the state mathematics examination for three consecutive years in the “I Promise” school founded by his hometown Akron, it has been strongly protested by members of the Akron public school board.

In this regard, the former NBA reporter “barbecue sister” Lu Yinqi commented on Weibo, causing heated discussion.

RELATED LINKS →Shocked! No one in grade 8 of James’s school passed the state math exam for three consecutive years.

Barbecue sister: LBJ founded the school and caused a big controversy on the bottom of the student’s performance. The money was spent and the result was not achieved.

Barbecue sister: James runs a school and comes out of 1.4 million. The government comes out of 6.6 million. The essence is the taxpayer’s money.

When it comes to the doubts James faced, American media Clutchpoints issued a rebuttal, saying that the mission of James school is not only to let 13-year-old children pass the exam, but also to solve the intergenerational problems of American education. What is important is that LeBlanc’s school can provide classrooms, teachers and opportunities for children who are missing.

RELATED LINKS → blame James for failing the exam? US media published: students lack education for many years before entering school, and 28% have disabilities

Later, the barbecue sister updated her microblog again to continue talking about this incident. She wrote: “Ha ha ha, the marketing number has begun to be generalized again. Have I ever blamed James from beginning to end? Did I say from the beginning that what James did was a good thing? But there are problems in the school. Now the result is not ideal. Are these facts still not to be said?”

“It’s still my sentence. The school has been running for 5 years and has failed all mathematics for 3 consecutive years, and the whole state is at the bottom. James himself spent 1.4 million, but more than 6 million was paid by the local government and taxpayers. A child in the school could ask the local government for a subsidy of 14000 dollars, and more than 200 children were more than 3 million. If this school is wholly owned by James, let alone fail in 3 years, even if the school fails in 30 years, no one is qualified to say a word. But now the taxpayer’s money is spent, and the local people are already poor enough. In the past three years, more than 20 teachers have gone, and the students enrolled by the school are no longer good, with more than 200 children, ask yourself, as long as there is a child who can pass cut-off scores, is this very demanding? Are we telling the truth? Isn’t it difficult to admit that there are problems in school operation and management?”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *