0 12 min 1 yr

Hart renewed his contract in advance, 4 years and 81 million years. The amount or even the number of years of this advance renewal can be guessed:

Hart previously executed his 13 million player options, and it was not difficult for him to win an annual salary greater than this number in the market this summer;

Hart didn’t jump out, indicating that Knicks had prepared a tempting enough contract to renew in advance;

The new version of the labor agreement allows the starting salary for renewal in advance to reach 140% of the salary in the last year of the previous contract, that is to say, Hart can get 18.2 million starting salary, which is in line with his real market price;

But it will take 24-25 seasons to get the money. The execution option is equal to Hart’s profit in the 23-24 season, so Knicks need to compensate for the number of years and give Hart a 4-year contract. The total price of 81 million is also the most money Hart can get according to the rules.

The benefit of Knicks is that it does not need to increase the salary slip of the 23-24 season, and then can sign Di winchinzo with a full middle-class contract. As an old teammate of Di Vincenzo, Hart also made efforts in recruiting. Hart made great achievements in optimizing the salary structure and acting as a lobbyist.

Hart signed an interesting comparison:

Hart renewed his contract in advance in 4 years and 81 million years. Fans gave praise one after another and said it was worth it;

Dillon’s 4-year decline contract, the guarantee part is only 86 million, why are fans talking about losing?

Dillon wind rating is definitely not just a matter of level, which everyone knows. However, it was true that Dillon’s BPM League was the last one in the playoffs. He handed over such data in a series with high popularity. After witnessing Dillon’s self-defense style, it was reasonable for the fans not to accept him to get a big contract.

If you want to divide the jigsaw player’s Jiugongge, Hart should be on the opposite diagonal line to Dillon. Dillon made 7.1 three points every 36 minutes last season and upgraded to 9.1 in the playoffs. The three-point hit rates were 32.6 percent and 23.8 percent respectively. However, Hart only shot 2.4 three points every 36 minutes, 3.3 in the playoffs, with a three-point hit rate of 37.2 percent and 31.3 percent respectively. Both of them were emptied.

However, in the case of being empty, throwing it with a quasi-star below or far below normal efficiency will certainly hurt the team more than throwing less. Hart can go in feint shot and try to find better opportunities for his teammates, instead of coming by himself in every round. As a 3D flank, Hart has beautiful assist figures. Careful shooting choices help him maintain a reasonable scoring efficiency. Then, with the strength and physical strength, he can grab the front rebound and put it together, hart was able to hand over a qualified supporting role report card on the offensive side.

It is nothing new to do more, make less, and make less mistakes. Puzzle players must have B numbers and only do what they can do. The interesting thing is the contradictory script seen from Hart and Dillon.

Hart is good at everything, strong in body, energetic, full of energy, tenacious in defense and not low in football merchants. The only two defects are the average height (1.93 meters) and the average three points, and these two things are very critical abilities as 3D flanks. Height cannot be changed, and projection can still be practiced.

But how does Hart view the three-point projection?

If we carry the three-point data of Hart’s career, you will find that his three-point output in different years has great ups and downs. In the first three seasons of his career, Hart shot 4.9 times, 5.8 times and 7.3 times every 36 minutes. The trend of more shots is very obvious. But from the fourth season, Hart gradually reduced the three-point output, from 7.3 to 5.2, then from 5.2 to 4.3, and finally fell to 2.4 times last season. In the 21-22 season, Hart was traded to the trailblazers halfway. The three-point output had a short explosive rebound. In these 13 games, Hart made 7.2 shots every 36 minutes, with a hit rate, it can be described as the most vigorous stage in his career, and the soaring fire during this period also makes the industry more optimistic about his future in the Pioneer, believing that the team has exchanged CJ for an ideal puzzle with more functional adaptation.

However, the rebound in these 13 games cannot explain too many problems. At that time, the Blazers had entered the stage of record dive, and there were players of any style who were still playing. Hart, as one of these players, had stronger abilities, it was reasonable to release himself. During this period, he even scored 44 points. Hart’s three-point production surge has nothing to do with his positioning improvement, and after returning to the pure puzzle positioning in the next season, he is cautious about the choice of shots.

Hart was very strong in college. However, he entered the league in 30 places. No matter in the Lakers or pelicans, he was surrounded by a high-talent future star, playing in a more “B number” way, becoming the kind of supporting role that fans like most “only know how to work hard, never rob the play” is his philosophy of success today. However, as a short flank, even if he has contributed the competition content beyond the height limit, it is necessary to make up the three-point short board if he wants to enter the top of the flank puzzle style, however, this premise must be that when standing outside the line, you must have the desire to vote.

Of course, for Knicks, this matter is not too fatal. For most of the time, Hart’s abilities in all aspects were enough. If Knicks had to set a 3D that could be cast outside, they also had the options of grammes and dichenzo. However, on the higher stage, you certainly hope that the players with nearly 20 million salaries in the team will provide enough help, rather than being regarded as a tangled option to play.

Dillon may be the opposite story.

Dillon and Hart entered the league in the same year, 15 times lower than Hart. But Dillon went to a grizzly bear on the eve of the new and old alternation. He was also one of the most important members of the grizzly bear during the transition period. Compared with the members who joined the team later, he was more qualified. The configuration of the grizzly bear is relatively lack of ball-holding developers, so Dillon has been playing a role close to the core player in the early stage of his career. Dillon’s career round share is 23.2%, in the 19-20 season, 20-21 season, 21-22 season, the round share is 25.2%, 26.1% and 28.8%, respectively, this is a proper second-head ball right. In the 21-year playoffs, Dillon made a series with a round share of 28.3 percent, a real hit rate of 59.5 percent, and an average of 25.8 points, while the opposite center was called Gobel.

So, where did Dillon get his confidence? He has always had this position in the grizzly bear. It is really awesome.

However, there is only one Dillon pure awesome series. More often, Dillon’s high output and low efficiency exist at the same time, and the real hit rate of 51.2% in his career can explain the problem. Dillon’s low efficiency and high yield are allowed, which has always been based on a premise-there are not many people who can do his job. Before 3J gradually matured, Bain proved the attributes other than shooters, dillon’s ball holding ranks behind Morant, which is generally in line with the configuration reality. The grizzly bear has always had a strange phenomenon:

On the one hand, they need Dillon, which is difficult to replace at both ends of attack and defense;

On the other hand, the biggest short board of the grizzly bear is exactly in Dillon-if the grizzly bear wants to be better, he must find a person who can take Dillon’s job and do better than him. However, after 3J and Bain grew up, Dillon’s functionality gradually became no longer scarce, and he could no longer accept the way he continued to play in the past. The play during the transition period can only be used in the transition period. It is not appropriate to continue playing like this when you come to the next level.

The following is the BPM situation of Dillon career:

It is hard for you to imagine that Dillon, a player in the segment, wants to find a positive sign from his career BPM watch.

BPM certainly underestimated Dillon’s contribution to the game, so there is no need to talk about defense. DBPM does not have much reference significance. OBPM is also much lower than other models, such as O-LEBRON and O-RAPTOR.

However, from the underlying logic differences of different models, OBPM underestimated Dillon, which just shows that Dillon’s inefficient playing method will hurt the team more when there is no special situation of poor attack and strong rebound. The rocket he is about to go to is a team of young talents who can compete with the grizzly bear. However, the young people grow up and take over the power, making him a pure puzzle role. The demand is also very similar, the reason why he failed to stay in the grizzly bear was the failure of the transformation from the “second head” orientation to the pure puzzle. Obviously, at least until the end of last season, Dillon was not ready to change himself.

Hart and Dillon have opposite stories. One knows the time, but he did too little in the advanced examination. The other is the failure to recognize yourself when welcoming the new changes. They shared two opposite truths:

Because you don’t try bravely if you don’t do well, you will see the end;

I clearly know that I can’t do it well, but I have to try it forcibly. It is very likely that I can do it more and more wrong.

Is this contradictory?

In fact, this is not difficult to understand. Life choice is just like shooting with empty outside lines. Both entering and not entering are possible. You must be prepared to bear the consequences at the moment you shoot. Then:

Do your age, work, family background and other conditions allow you to have some room for trial and error?

If so, you can move more thoughts to pursue higher goals and achievements.

If all aspects of conditions do not allow you to make mistakes easily, then it is better to be steadfast and reliable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *